apache apachecon app apple asf atom atomprotocol atompub barcamprdu blogapps blogging businessblogging conferences family feeds foss general glassfish google humor ibm java javaone links linux mac microsoft movies music netbeans opensocial opensource photos politics rest roller rome rss socialnetworking socialsite socialsoftware sun triangle trianglebloggers vacation webdev webservices wiki


Main | Next day (Jan 27, 2003) »

Sunday Jan 26, 2003

85 or 101 reasons, rebutted.

Comments[0] by Dave in Java

Whether you back Java or Dot-Net you have to agree that Carlos Perez's 101 Reasons Java is better than Dot-Net has resulted in some very interesting discussions. I've learned a lot from reading the responses from both camps. The latest and so far the best post on the topic is Ted Neward's 85 of 101 Reasons, Rebutted.

JavaLobby Community Platform.

Comments[1] by Dave in Java

This looks like it could be useful. Congrats to Matt and team. I am looking forward to taking a closer look at the code.

Quiet release of Roller 0.9.6.4.

Comments[2] by Dave in Roller

This release is the same code-base that Anthony Eden is currently running on FreeRoller. It includes some minor bug fixes and makes more effective use of caching on the main (index.jsp) page. Get it on SourceForge. Roller 0.9.7 is still a little ways off. By the way, FreeRoller is processing 1,000,000 hits per month, all on a "dinky" little eMachines box.

Comparing Swing and SWT.

Comments[0] by Dave in Java

Charles Ditzel has taken the time to write a thoughtful article in the form of a weblog entry on Swing versus SWT. For those who have been stuck on the server-side for their entire Java careers: Swing is Sun's emulation-based Java UI toolkit and SWT is IBM's native widget-based Java UI toolkit. Charles works for Sun, so you can expect to find a little bias in the article. For example:

Charles Ditzel, Comparing Swing and SWT: Swing can provide a look and feel that exactly matches that of the platform, provides a more consistent cross-platform story, and offers a level of flexibility far and beyond what is possible with SWT.

I have yet to see a Swing-based GUI that exactly matches the Windows look-and-feel. There is always some noticable difference, and where is that Windows XP look and feel? Other than that, he has some good points (disclaimer: I know Swing, but not SWT). If you care about Java GUI development then the article is well worth a read.

One thing that Charles fails to point out is that Swing is intended to be a general purpose GUI toolkit whereas SWT is intended to support Eclipse. SWT/JFaces may grow into a world-beating general purpose GUI toolkit someday, but right now Swing is the choice for general purpose Java GUI development. Maybe that is why the payware version of Eclipse (Websphere Studio) supports GUI building with Swing and AWT and not with SWT.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright 2002-2007, David M Johnson (dave.johnson at rollerweblogger.org)

This is a personal weblog, I do not speak for my employer.